Nisan 2016 / (24 - 1)
İleri yaş erkek hastada eksternal anal sfinkter yorgunluğu nedeni olarak sarkopeni
Kurumlar
Department of Gastroenterology, Education and Research Hospital, Ankara
Özet
Sarkopeni, ilerlemiş yaşa bağlı kas kütlesi ve fonksiyonlarındaki azalmadır.
Yaşam kalitesini etkileyen bir faktör olan sarkopeni, anal sfinkter fonksiyonlarında da azalma ve fekal inkontinense neden olabilir. Bu olgu sunumunda
eksternal anal sfinkter yorgunluğuna neden olarak fekal inkontinens gelişmiş
bir vaka sunulacaktır.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Anal manometri, inkontinens, anal sfinkter
Giriş
Sarcopenia, defined as loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, is associated with impaired quality of life in elderly age
(1). Accordingly, elderly persons are particularly susceptible
to faecal incontinence (FI) due to ageing of neuromuscular
system (2). FI is an important health burden on elderly patients and their families, nurses, physicians and health-care
system (3). Polypharmacy and comorbidity plays an additional negative effect on anal sphincter dysfunction due to
ageing.
External anal sphincter (EAS) is naturally subject to fatigue.
Voluntary contraction failure of the EAS is an important factor in FI. The fatigue rate (FR) is a computerized system parameter to show the sustained voluntary contraction of EAS
in anorectal manometry (ARM), considering the squeeze
pressure and the EAS fatigability.
Although FR is thought to be a practical index to reveal the
patients with anal sphincter dysfunctions, there is no enough
data for elderly individuals. In this clinical case study we
present a 62 year-old male patient. He had a complaint of
fecal soiling although his anal sphincter resting pressure was
normal.
Olgu
Based on the above-mentioned data of our patient, anal
sphincter pressures were adversely affected in elderly age.
The patient did not have any neurological disease or colorectal surgery that might cause anal sphincter dysfunction. EAS is important in faecal continence and may be susceptible
to fatigue in elderly men due to sarcopenia. Nevertheless, fatigability is not routinely measured in anorectal examinations.
Several studies state conflicting results regarding the fatigue
rate of EAS (2-5). Nockolds et al. stated that females with anal
incontinence have a weaker but more fatigue-resistant EAS
compared to women with constipation. This difference was
proposed to be linked with presence of higher proportion
of slow-twitch muscle fibres (3). We propose that the different results are likely due to different pelvic floor anatomy of
women and men. No doubt, further studies are necessary to
clarify this issue. Nevertheless, new studies on muscle fibers
(slow twitched and fast twitched) should be gender and age
specific. Herein, the issue of concern is underestimation of subclinical
faecal incontinence of elderly individuals. Therefore, longterm personal and social problems due to mild incontinence
in elderly patients often go unrecognized.
In conclusion, anal incontinence should be considered as
an adverse effect of ageing due to sarcopenia in elderly with
otherwise normal resting anal sphincter pressure. It should
not be underestimated and motility study should be done
even if subclinical FI has been suspected in elderly. Also,
long squeeze pressure recording is necessary in elderly patients even if the resting pressure is normal. Further studies
are necessary to clarify the impact of age and gender on anal
continence problems. Finally, new studies regarding geriatric
sarcopenia should address anal sphincter dysfunctions.
Tartışma
Based on the above-mentioned data of our patient, anal
sphincter pressures were adversely affected in elderly age.
The patient did not have any neurological disease or colorectal surgery that might cause anal sphincter dysfunction. EAS is important in faecal continence and may be susceptible
to fatigue in elderly men due to sarcopenia. Nevertheless, fatigability is not routinely measured in anorectal examinations.
Several studies state conflicting results regarding the fatigue
rate of EAS (2-5). Nockolds et al. stated that females with anal
incontinence have a weaker but more fatigue-resistant EAS
compared to women with constipation. This difference was
proposed to be linked with presence of higher proportion
of slow-twitch muscle fibres (3). We propose that the different results are likely due to different pelvic floor anatomy of
women and men. No doubt, further studies are necessary to
clarify this issue. Nevertheless, new studies on muscle fibers
(slow twitched and fast twitched) should be gender and age
specific. Herein, the issue of concern is underestimation of subclinical
faecal incontinence of elderly individuals. Therefore, longterm personal and social problems due to mild incontinence
in elderly patients often go unrecognized.
In conclusion, anal incontinence should be considered as
an adverse effect of ageing due to sarcopenia in elderly with
otherwise normal resting anal sphincter pressure. It should
not be underestimated and motility study should be done
even if subclinical FI has been suspected in elderly. Also,
long squeeze pressure recording is necessary in elderly patients even if the resting pressure is normal. Further studies
are necessary to clarify the impact of age and gender on anal
continence problems. Finally, new studies regarding geriatric
sarcopenia should address anal sphincter dysfunctions.
Kaynaklar
1. Bosaeus I, Rothenberg E. Nutrition and physical activity for the prevention and treatment of age-related sarcopenia. Proc Nutr Soc 2015;1:1-7.
2. Bilali S, Pfeifer J. Anorectal manometry: are fatigue rate and fatigue rate
index of any clinical importance? Tech Coloproctol 2005;9:225-8.
3. Nockolds CL, Hosker GL, Kiff ES. Fatigue rate of the external anal
sphincter. Colorectal Dis 2012;14:1095-100. 4. Telford KJ, Ali AS, Lymer K, et al. Fatigability of the external anal
sphincter in anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:746-52.
5. Paganotti B, Miasato M, Kardoch FP, et al. Fatigue rate index is higher in
children with functional constipation and retentive fecal incontinence. J
Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2015;61:525-6.